Expected Inflation, Expected Stock Returns, and Money Illusion: What Can We Learn from Survey Expectations?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Expectations of Returns and Expected Returns
We analyze time series of investor expectations of future stock market returns from six data sources between 1963 and 2011. The six measures of expectations are highly positively correlated with each other, as well as with past stock returns and with the level of the stock market. However, investor expectations are strongly negatively correlated with model-based expected returns. The evidence i...
متن کاملDurability of Output and Expected Stock Returns
The demand for durable goods is more cyclical than that for nondurable goods and services. Consequently, the cash flow and stock returns of durable-good producers are exposed to higher systematic risk. Using the benchmark input-output accounts of the National Income and Product Accounts, we construct portfolios of durablegood, nondurable-good, and service producers. In the cross-section, an inv...
متن کاملDownside Correlation and Expected Stock Returns
If investors are more averse to the risk of losses on the downside than of gains on the upside, investors ought to demand greater compensation for holding stocks with greater downside risk. Downside correlations better capture the asymmetric nature of risk than downside betas, since conditional betas exhibit little asymmetry across falling and rising markets. We find that stocks with high downs...
متن کاملConsumption, Aggregate Wealth and Expected Stock Returns
This paper studies the role of detrended wealth in predicting stock returns. We call a transitory movement in wealth one that produces a deviation from its shared trend with consumption and labor income. Using U.S. quarterly stock market data we find that these trend deviations in wealth are strong predictors of both real stock returns and excess returns over a Treasury bill rate. We also find ...
متن کاملValue at Risk and Expected Stock Returns
This paper provides empirical evidence that firm size, liquidity, and Value-at-Risk (VaR) explain the cross-sectional variation in expected returns, while market beta and total volatility have almost no power to capture the cross-section of expected returns at the firm level. The strong positive relation between average returns and VaR turns out to be robust across different investment horizons...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1137898